Ai Detector

AI Content Detector

Identify AI-generated content in research papers, essays, and text. Understand if content was written by humans or artificial intelligence.

Overview

The AI Detector helps you:

  • Identify AI-generated text - Detect if content was written by AI
  • Understand patterns - See which sections are likely AI-generated
  • Score confidence - Get probability scores for detection
  • Analyze multiple papers - Check batch documents at once

How It Works

The detector analyzes text by examining:

  • Writing patterns - Distinctive AI language markers
  • Vocabulary usage - Common AI word choices
  • Sentence structure - How sentences are typically formed by AI
  • Redundancy patterns - Repetitive phrases and concepts
  • Coherence metrics - How logically organized text flows

Getting Started

Check a Single Document

  1. Click "AI Detector" tab
  2. Paste or upload your text
  3. Click "Analyze"
  4. Wait for analysis (usually <30 seconds)
  5. Review results and detailed report

Upload a Paper

  1. Click "Upload File"
  2. Select PDF or text file
  3. System extracts text
  4. Automatic analysis begins
  5. Results appear in real-time

Enter Text Directly

  1. Click "Paste Text"
  2. Copy-paste your content
  3. Click "Analyze"
  4. Review results

Understanding Results

Overall Score

0-20% AI Probability

  • Likely human-written
  • Natural writing patterns
  • Authentic voice

20-50% AI Probability

  • Possibly mixed or edited by AI
  • Some AI characteristics detected
  • Review flagged sections

50-80% AI Probability

  • Likely AI-assisted or edited
  • Clear AI patterns present
  • Significant AI influence

80-100% AI Probability

  • Likely AI-generated
  • Strong AI writing patterns
  • Minimal human contribution

Detailed Analysis

For each section of text, you see:

Per-Paragraph Scores

  • Each paragraph gets AI probability
  • Red highlights = likely AI
  • Yellow = possibly AI
  • Green = likely human

Confidence Indicators

  • How certain the detection is
  • Higher confidence = more reliable
  • Based on pattern strength

Pattern Explanations

  • Why a section was flagged
  • What patterns triggered detection
  • Specific writing characteristics

Common Use Cases

Check Your Own Work

Verify you're not accidentally using too much AI:

  1. Paste your draft
  2. Review results
  3. Revise heavily AI-assisted sections
  4. Maintain academic integrity

Evaluate Student Work

Screen submissions for appropriate AI use:

  1. Upload submission
  2. Review AI score and breakdown
  3. Identify heavily AI-generated sections
  4. Discuss with student

Review Literature

Check papers and sources:

  1. Copy paper abstract or section
  2. Run detection
  3. Understand if it's likely AI-generated
  4. Evaluate credibility

Validate Research

Before citing a source:

  1. Extract relevant section
  2. Run detector
  3. Check if content is authentic
  4. Make informed decisions about sources

Interpreting Results Carefully

Limitations to Know

  • Tool provides estimates - Not absolute proof
  • False positives possible - Can flag human writing
  • False negatives possible - Can miss some AI content
  • Context matters - What's normal varies by field
  • Technical writing - May naturally appear "AI-like"

What It Doesn't Detect

  • Subtle paraphrasing of AI content
  • Content edited to sound more human
  • Human writing that sounds "AI-like"
  • Papers entirely human-written

What It Does Well

  • Obvious AI-generated text
  • Unedited AI outputs
  • Large AI-written sections
  • Predominantly AI content

Best Practices

Academic Integrity

✅ Acceptable uses:

  • Brainstorming and ideation
  • Editing and refining your writing
  • Translating concepts
  • Grammar and style checking
  • Generating outlines

❌ Against academic integrity:

  • Submitting AI-generated text as your own
  • Using AI without disclosure
  • Relying entirely on AI to write
  • Hiding AI assistance

Using Results

  1. Review flagged sections - Read what was flagged
  2. Understand context - Why was it flagged?
  3. Make your decision - Is the flag valid?
  4. Rewrite if needed - Ensure authentic voice
  5. Check your policy - Follow your institution's rules

Improving Your Scores

  • Write in your authentic voice - Use your natural style
  • Add personal insights - Include your own analysis
  • Cite sources - Show original thinking
  • Revise AI drafts - Don't submit first output
  • Mix strategies - Combine AI assistance with human writing

Common Questions

Q: Can AI write something this detector won't catch? A: Yes, with significant human editing or clever prompting.

Q: Should I be worried if something scores high? A: Only if you wrote it and didn't use AI. Otherwise, it's useful information.

Q: Can I use AI if I disclose it? A: Check your institution's policy. Many allow AI use with proper disclosure.

Q: How accurate is the detector? A: 85-90% accurate on clear cases. Less reliable on mixed content.

Q: Should I trust this completely? A: No. Use as one tool in evaluating content authenticity.

Batch Processing

Check multiple documents at once:

  1. Click "Batch Upload"
  2. Select multiple files
  3. System analyzes in parallel
  4. Get report with all results
  5. Sort and compare scores
  6. Export summary report

Exporting Reports

Save detection results:

  1. Click "Export Report"
  2. Choose format: PDF or CSV
  3. Includes:
    • Overall score
    • Section-by-section breakdown
    • Pattern explanations
    • Timestamp and file info
  4. File downloads

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Cmd/Ctrl+U - Upload file
  • Cmd/Ctrl+V - Paste text
  • Cmd/Ctrl+A - Start analysis
  • Cmd/Ctrl+E - Export report

Policy & Ethics

Your Institution's Policy

  • Check your school/organization rules
  • Understand what's allowed
  • Follow disclosure requirements
  • Maintain academic integrity

Responsible Use

  • Use detector to improve your work
  • Not to catch or accuse others
  • Discuss results, not just accusations
  • Assume good intent

Limitations & Caveats

The detector:

  • Works best on unedited AI text
  • May flag technical writing as AI
  • Needs enough text (500+ words ideal)
  • Can have false positives/negatives
  • Should never be the only factor in judgment

Always use human judgment alongside automated detection.

Next Steps